Posts Tagged ‘Electronic Medical Records’




How to properly select the best medical practice software

Tuesday, November 11th, 2008

By Pascal Helou

 

New York, NY - Selecting medical practice software falls in the following categories:

o     Someone (doctor, office managers) knows someone that has similar software and they “like” it.

o     Vendors are invited to give proposals but the process of comparing the proposals is challenging at best. It is very difficult for non-area specific experts to be able to compare software features, technologies and price. Vendors will tend to give a low price for a basic solution but the real solution that the office will need may be multiples higher in final cost. They rope you in with a low price than add on fees dramatically once you are locked in.

o     The doctor or office manager reads a glowing article on a software solution and decides to implement that solution based on the article written.

 

I have been in many situations where I was brought in to help resolve the result of poor decisions that have left practices in chaos with angry physicians, frustrated staff and unhappy patients after months of wasted efforts and at a tremendous cost leaving the practice worse off than they started! So how do you go about ensuring a successful selection of the right software for your medical practice?

 

Steering Committee

o     A steering committee needs to be created that is accountable and is comprised of the best people from all areas of the practice.

o     Each person is a stakeholder and represents a specific area of the business in the practice.

o     The steering committee leadership needs to have deep technical, project management skills as well as a good understanding of the current work flow of the practice. They will rely on each of the stakeholders to properly define the needs and requirements of their areas.

o     There has to be a commitment and practice management must make the team members available and dedicated for the process to work.

 

Defining goals and objectives

The process of selecting a practice software solution at this stage is more based on the business needs and politics than on technology.

o     Indentify immediate and long term practice goals.

o     Clearly outline the business goals and direction. This includes any planed new service offerings, any changes in reporting requirements, changes in office situations and a review of the current systems that are in use.

o     Generate a document with clear goals and objectives, list of major features that are required, any specific technological limitations or requirements, list of systems that the new practice solution must be able to interface with, general timeframe and budget.

 

Performing an audit and mapping out workflows

Most software implementations fail because people throw money at a vendor who intern drops a solution into a practice with little training. This process is doomed to fail since even the best software cannot fix an inefficient or ineffective workflow!

 

Medical practices rely on information from many systems both internally and externally. Just adding technology will not necessarily improve your practice’s productivity. It has been shown that simply introducing new technology usually results in decreased productivity. The staff must maintain the current way they do their work while learning a new system. Adding new technology to an inefficient workflow does not result in efficiency gains.

 

It is amazing how many times people do things but no longer remember why they do those things. In one practice, one staff member was dedicated to filling out and processing certain paperwork that was sent to another department. The other department had changed their policies long time ago, failed to notify the other department and simply threw out the paper work! The best way is to map out the current workflow of all processes in the practice.

 

o     Perform an audit trail of the patient encounter form as it travels throughout the office workflow.

o     Document every system that provides or receives information from the patient encounter and the people involved.

o     Document the workflows.

o     Having a detailed map of each process, the people and systems they involved is critical to properly selecting the right software solution, maximizing efficiencies and ensuring a successful implementation.

 

Defining your system requirements

o     Start by the things you can’t or don’t want to change such as the need to be able to interface with system A, B and C, the need for a multi-office solution or the need to support key business requirements.

o     Reduce the number of vendors by the capabilities outlined in your requirements, by costs and by complexity.

o     Call your colleagues with similar practices and see what they have done.

o     Create an RFP (Request For Proposal) and distribute your request to the top vendors that have passed your initial minimum requirements.

 

System review and selection

o     Start by eliminating any system that does not meet your system requirements. Many vendors will say that is planned in the next release. If it isn’t in the system now, don’t count on it being there any time soon or for free.

o     The software must be able to work with existing systems.

o     Many vendors promise that their system can interface to many systems. What is usually not disclosed is that this sometimes requires special programming and can be very expensive.

o     Request a demonstration of the software once you have the vendor proposals. Make sure what is demonstrated is what you will be buying with all the features you will need and includes all costs. Many vendors show their top fully loaded application then sell you an entry version at a much lower cost to get you in the door. You end up spending so much more just to get to where you thought you had purchased.

o     Each team member needs to review the software from their area’s perspective.

o     A new process map needs to be created with the new system in mind so that each stakeholder can see how this will impact people’s tasks and ultimately show how the new software solution will streamline current workflows and result in new efficiencies.

o     Try to visit an office that is similar in size and scope as yours that has the software you are looking to implement. Interview many people involved in the process and try to get as many lessons learned as possible.

o     The final step is to select 3 top vendors and negotiate on price. Get everything in writing and do not accept any verbal promises.

 

Before signing a contract, closely review the contract with a technologist!!! I don’t know how many times I have reviewed contracts that were full of thousands of dollars in unnecessary line items. For every $100,000 contracts, at least 25% were things added that were not necessary for the success of the project. One client had a $25,000 option for an EMR solution that they had paid for as part of a much larger practice software package. I was doing an audit for the client when I made that discovery. They approached the vendor to implement that option. The vendor stated that since the software was purchased 3 years ago, the hardware and software has changed so much that it is now obsolete. It will cost them an additional $50,000 if they want the EMR option.

 

Conclusion
Selecting and implementing an EMR/Practice Management system is a complex undertaking that requires commitment from everyone that will be using the system. A committed steering committee is critical, clear objectives and goals, a detailed process map, workflows, system requirements are all critical to the proper selections of an EMR system. Keep in mind that more than 50% of EMR implementations fail because of improper technology selection, poor planning, lack of commitment and lack of training. One way to make sure your implementation is a success is to hire an independent third party technology consultant that is not associated with the vendor but is rather your hired technology expert. Their sole job is to make this a success while everyone else in the process has their real job to do as well. They will flush out which solution is best suited for your needs, project manage the implementation and keep the vendor honest. Their keys strengths are business and technology skills, strong project management and people skills. You can always contact us and we will be happy to give you a free consultation and or point you in the right direction!



How do you justify the cost of implementing an EMR system?

Thursday, October 9th, 2008

By Pascal Helou

New York, NY - The cost of an EMR system is a function of several factors such as the complexity of the EMR feature sets, whether the system is an in-house solution or rented software as a service solution, the number of doctors and if more than one office is required to access the information.It costs $25,000 to $40,000 in labor costs per year per physician by simply staying in paper and not using an EMR solution. Switching to an EMR solution was demonstrated in a Congressional testimony in 1999 that will save $40,250 per year per physicians. A complex EMR investment should pay for itself in less than 2 years and a simpler solution can return savings instantly.
How do you determine the real costs for your current paper based charting system?
Determine the number of charts pulled and re-filed in a week. A typical week for most doctors is 375 charts per doctor. If it takes on average 8 minutes to file and re-file a chart, then your staff is spending 50 hours per week to pull and re-file charts. If you are paying your staff $15 per hour, this translates into a yearly cost of $39,000 per physician. The costs of $117,000 add up quickly for a 3 physician office. You can reduce those costs by $81,900 per year by implementing an EMR. An EMR solution also scales much easier and costs are further reduced as physicians are added.

 

A basic EMR solution that simply allows the staff to scan your current patient encounters has been very popular among my clients in the NYC area because the system is a fraction of the cost of a full blown EMR solution, is implemented in a few days, requires little training and you use your current forms and documents. The system simply stores all documents electronically. To pull a file simply requires that you type the patient name into the system. The second selling feature in the NYC area is that it saves on all that storage space required to keep all those paper records. That space can be used for another exam room or office. The third selling feature is providing disaster recovery. Since the records are electronic, they can easily be backed up offsite. The forth selling feature is the ability to have access to these records in more than one location. No more having to carry patient records in your car which can be a HIPAA violation.

 

Additional Savings

More savings can be realized in the investment of a more complex EMR solution.

o     Paper storage costs add huge savings. A typical space used to store the paper records is on average 500ft2. The average costs for space in NYC of $65 ft2 leads to savings of $32,500 per year.

o     Transcription costs can either be eliminated or drastically reduced in a well designed template system. This can translate into $36,000 in savings per year per physician. Systems that require you continue hand-writing in the charts will increase costs do to the added steps of the process.

o     Malpractice premium costs may go down as the improved documentation leads to better patient care. New government initiatives, grants and tax incentives are also planed to encourage the deployment of EMR solutions.

o     Storing records electronically also eliminates the need to print expensive microfilm.

o     Increased productivity has also allowed the addition of providers without additional staff.

 

Conclusion

Implementing a basic EMR solution is the cheapest and easiest to get up and running with the lowest risks. Complex EMR solutions have so much more to offer but also are more expensive, complicated, time consuming to implement and carry much more risk. I have implemented many flavors of both and find that a basic EMR solution (electronic document storage) works best for small practices and even some large offices. Implementing a full blown EMR solution is a complex undertaking that requires extensive workflow analysis, project management skills, stake holders, a large budget, a timeframe of 12-18 months and commitment from everyone involved. This solution has worked well in larger offices and has the greatest productivity gains in the long run. You can always contact us and we will be happy to give you a free consultation and or point you in the right direction!



How do you choose an EMR solution?

Tuesday, September 9th, 2008

By Pascal Helou

New York, NY - The first step to implement an EMR solution is to document the current office workflow that supports the patient encounter. This is a tedious, iterative and time consuming process that is critical to the success of any EMR implementation. Document exactly what happens when a patients sees a doctor. What forms do they fill out? What happens to those forms? Are they sent to other departments? What systems is data entered into? Who are the people involved and what do they do to move the process forward? Every detail, process, form, system, technology and person involved in the process has to be properly documented to fully understand the workflow of a patient encounter. This process involves many iterations and every person that is involved in the process before a complete understanding is gained.

Once this is documented, you can then identify areas that need improvement, steps that are no longer required, and areas in the process that can benefit from technology and interfaces that will be required to work with existing systems.

You start by eliminating any vendor that does not meet your minimum system requirements. The areas of focus will then be on the feature sets and whether they satisfy your current and future needs.

I will begin by the process by focusing on the underlying technology. Is the solution based on a server you keep in house or can you access the application on the Internet? The advantages to an in-house solution is that the system is much faster, is always available even if the Internet goes down and you have better control of your patient information since it stays in your office. The disadvantage is that there is a larger upfront cost and you have to maintain the server. The alternative is to “rent” the solution. You access the application over the Internet. The advantages are that you have access from anywhere. No or low upfront costs. No servers to maintain in-house. The disadvantage is that the system will always be slower than an in-house solution and will have higher monthly costs. Your data is out of your control and resides off-site. If the Internet goes down, your staff will have little to do till service is restored. Another thing to remember is when a doctor decides to change service; it is much easier to do it on your own terms with an in-house based server than with a hosted solution where you have no control.

 

Built in patient schedulers or an interface to your existing patient scheduler is critical to reducing errors. If you already are using a billing software that has a patient scheduler then you will want your EMR system to interface with your billing software. That way the staff can schedule a patient in the billing system as they have always done and that information is transmitted automatically to the EMR system. You don’t want to be in a situation where you have to enter the patient schedule into multiple systems. This greatly increases errors and reduces efficiencies.

 

You also need to consider who uses the patient schedule. The doctors and staff all use that information differently. The staff accesses the patient/doctor schedules from their computers. The doctors may prefer to have that information on their wireless devices. The schedule must also be able to be updated real time wirelessly…These are the types of scenarios that can seriously reduce the success of the project.

 

Patient tracking can help reduce patient waiting times. Tracking patients through your office will help determine where the bottle necks are and help you better plan your resources.

                 

What physicians fear the most is that by switching to an EMR system the new process will slow them down causing them to see less patients in a day. Templates are key to decreasing the time required in the patient encounter. There are several methods of data collection. The first is predefined paragraphs of text. Paragraphs of text are created by the physicians who address a specific diagnosis, procedure or treatment. As the doctor performs their patient review, they select the predefined paragraph that best meets the patient ailment.

  

The flow through the system, how many clicks it takes to get to the information you need is very important to doctors. Reducing the time to do something and customizing the process to work with the doctor is critical to making the new system a hit.

 

EMR systems contain many areas for documentation. They typically include Patient Vitals, Family History, Illness History, Lab Reports, Dictations and Medications.

 

Patient Vitals – Reason for patient visit, chief complaint and patient vitals are recorded in this section.

 

Family History – Past family history, any allergies and current medications. 

 

Illness History – Details for patient illness history.

 

Lab Reports – labs and diagnostic imaging reports. Some even allow you to import the actual test, scan or image for reference. Make sure the system as a HL7 interface if you would like the actual tests, scan or images directly sent from the lab equipment into the EMR system. This usually requires some programming but is worth while having all patient data in one location.

 

Dictations – There are several methods to handle dictations.

o     Directly - Speak directly into a microphone and the system transcribes in real time. My experience is that busy doctors simply do not have the time for this since these systems are not totally accurate and require you to edit the results.

o     Dragon Naturally Speaking - The most accurate and popular voice recognition software is Dragon Naturally Speaking. You dictate into the application and import the results into the EMR. This is more accurate but requires two steps.

o     Templates combined with Dragon Naturally Speaking – You create templates that define in detail a particular problem. You simply select the most appropriate template and dictate the specific details. This is the best tradeoff since it is the fastest (other than dictating into a recorder and sending it out for it to be transcribed) and lowers dictations costs. You need to accept the fact that the end note is not perfect

o     The last method is the fastest but most expensive. Doctors dictate as usual and send it out to be transcribed. The returned report is scanned into the EMR.

 

Medications – History of medications and prescriptions. Some EMR systems that are tied to an electronic prescription service allow you to electronically send the prescription directly to the pharmacist with a few clicks. This reduces costs and errors.

 

Conclusion

Choosing an EMR solution is a daunting task with so much at stake with more than 60% of all EMR projects implemented failing. The role I usually help clients with is project leader/manager. Clients have the most difficult part with selecting the right EMR solution, documenting workflows and implementation. The project can be a major success with the proper structure, planning, commitment and a team with the proper skill sets to deliver the right solution. You can always contact us and we will be happy to give you a free consultation and or point you in the right direction!

 

1 “Electronic Medical Records: Lessons from Small Physician Practices”, prepared by University of

California, San Francisco for the California HealthCare Foundation, October, 2003



Which is better Electronic Document Storage or EMR?

Saturday, August 9th, 2008

By Pascal Helou

New York, NY - The process begins by reviewing your system requirements created from your current workflow audit. The question you then must answer to help select the proper solution is whether you want a simple Electronic Document Storage solution or a complete EMR/practice management system?

 

Electronic Document Storage solution
An Electronic Document Storage solution simply replaces your filing cabinets/paper charts with electronic charts. This option is popular in NYC because it is much cheaper (1/20th the cost of a full blown EMR/practice management system) and simpler to implement (can be deployed in a few days).

 

Doctors and staff continue to capture office visit information using the existing paper forms. The office usually hires a bunch of high school students that spend a few weeks scanning the patient paper records into the system. This process can proceed in parallel with the current office operations without any disruptions. Once all paper records are scanned in, the doctors and staff can access all patient records electronically in seconds from any location. The staff simply scans the paper charts after a patient encounter or at the end of the day as a batch process.

 

A basic Document Storage solution requires the following:

o     $1,000 - Medium end scanner (used by staff for general scanning)

o     $3,000-$5,000 - High speed scanner (used for batch scanning)

o     $5,000-$10,000 - Electronic Document Storage software

o     $3,000 – file server to host Electronic Document Storage software

o     $1,000 - training

Total costs $13,000-$20,000 (total costs regardless of number of physicians)

 

If you are a small office then you can reduce the training, remove the file server for total costs of under $10,000. The system can be setup in 1-2 days. Maintenance costs and support are minimal.

 

The EMR/practice management solution
The EMR/practice management system is a powerful solution (integrated EMR and complete practice management solution), much more complicated (requires complete understanding of current workflows, systems and processes) and time-consuming to properly deploy (takes anywhere from 6-18 months to deploy).

 

The typical EMR/practice management system costs $15,000-$50,000 per physician according to a report produced for the California HealthCare Foundation1. The high end EMR implementations that I have worked with have averaged $150,000.

 

Most of the EMR/practice management systems I have implemented were on large offices connected to hospitals. The Electronic Document Storage solutions have been popular with small medical practices.

 

Conclusion
Both the basic EMR and EMR/Practice Management solutions have much to offer. The basic EMR can begin to pay for itself in a few days, is easy to implement, is inexpensive and provides an immediate ROI. The EMR/Practice Management solution is expensive, complex, is riskier to implement but carries the highest efficiency gains. What’s best for you depends on the complexity of your workflows, your budget, timeframe and calculated ROI. You can always contact us and we will be happy to give you a free consultation and or point you in the right direction!



EMR (Electronic Medical Records) for FREE

Saturday, July 5th, 2008

By Pascal Helou

New York, NY - There are two types of EMR solutions. The first is a basic EMR which is an electronic filing cabinet. The patient records are scanned and stored electronically thereby eliminating the paper and filing cabinets. The second is a full blown EMR which is much more complex. The focus of this paper is the basic EMR. 

A basic EMR solution has been very popular among my clients in the NYC area because the system is less than 1/20th the cost of a full blown EMR solution, is implemented in a few days, requires little training and you use your current forms and documents. The system begins to pay for itself immediately. All documents are stored electronically. To retrieve a patient file simply requires that you type the patient name into the system. The second selling feature in the NYC area is that it saves on all that storage space required to keep all those paper records. That space can be used for another exam room or office. The third selling feature is providing disaster recovery. Since the records are electronic, they can easily be backed up offsite. The forth selling feature is the ability to have access to these records in more than one location. No more having to carry patient records in your car which can be a HIPAA violation.       

 The following is 11 reasons to implement an EMR:

 

1.      The greatest savings is in labor costs. It is estimated that over 70 percent of the costs associated with pulling and re-filing charts can be eliminated resulting in head count reductions. Determine the number of charts pulled and re-filed in a week. A typical week for most doctors is 375 charts per doctor. If it takes on average 5 minutes to file a chart and 3 minutes to re-file the chart, then your staff is spending 50 hours per week to pull and re-file charts. If you are paying your staff $15 per hour, this translates into a yearly cost of $39,000 per physician. The yearly recurring cost of $117,000 adds up quickly for a 3 physician office.

2.      Paper storage costs add huge savings. A typical space used to store the paper records is on average 500ft2. The average cost for space in NYC of $65 ft2 leads to savings of $32,500 per year.

3.      Transcription costs can either be eliminated or drastically reduced in a well designed template system. This can translate into $36,000 in savings per year per physician.

4.      Malpractice premium costs may go down as the improved documentation leads to better patient care. New government initiatives, grants and tax incentives are also planed to encourage the deployment of EMR solutions.

5.      Storing records electronically also eliminates the need to print expensive microfilm.

6.      Increased productivity also allows for the addition of providers without additional staff.

7.      EMR can help you achieve maximum reimbursement by guiding you through the coding process and ensures you have documented each encounter properly.

8.      EMR records also help protect you in the event of an audit.

9.      EMR can help provide discounts in malpractice insurance premiums. Improved documentation, accountability and tracking helps in reducing medical errors which can result in lower premiums.

10.  Medical Liability Monitor conducted a survey in 2005 that indicated that the four-state average of the highest liability rates for OB/GYN was $230,919. Malpractice insurance companies provided a 2-5% EMR credit which translates into a savings of $4,600 to $11,500 per provider per year.

11.  Stark and anti-kickback laws provide subsidies for hospitals and regional healthcare providers if they purchase an EMR with the following criteria: Data from the EMR can be communicated to other EMR systems, E-prescribing capabilities and interoperate with other provider systems. The state of New York contributed $52.9 million in funding in 2006 to create community RHIOs and increase use of interoperable EMRs. The state handed out $105 million in 2008 to 96 hospitals in order to create a statewide EMR system.

 

More savings can be realized in the investment of a more complex EMR solution but at a much greater cost and risk.

 

Keep in mind that the national average for a successful EMR implementation is 40% meaning that 60% of EMR projects fail! You cannot simply select a vendor and write a check and expect the process to work its way out. The role I usually take is project manager between the practice and vendor keeping everyone on schedule. This role requires strong project planning skills, detailed workflow analysis of the practice, technology, process and people skills.

Conclusion
EMRs can pay for themselves in a short period of time through significant cost savings and increased revenues for your practice. The initial investment can be as little as $10,000 for a simple EMR solution taking a few days to implement to a full blown EMR solution costing $150,000 and taking 16 months to fully implement. The cost savings are very real. Your bottom line will decrease during implementation but should drastically increase as the system is brought on line and the staff begins to work more efficiently. You can always contact us and we will be happy to give you a free consultation and or point you in the right direction!